TL;DR: Four times a year, growth stocks reprice overnight, and the Earnings Reaction Gaps workshop from Ticker Monkey exists for exactly those weeks. Veterans John Pocorobba and Jason Thompson teach the four forms of ERx gaps, a 10-day post-gap swing method, candlestick entry combinations, and how implied options volatility frames the market’s expectations, across 7-plus hours of instruction, a research PDF topping 300 pages, and more than 80 annotated chart examples.
What an ERx Gap Actually Is
The Earnings Reaction Gaps workshop is Ticker Monkey’s program on trading the price gaps that follow earnings reports in growth-stock leaders. The teaching starts by classifying the reaction into four distinct gap forms, because a gap that opens above resistance on doubled volume is a different animal from one that fades by lunch. Classify the form correctly and the rest of the playbook opens up.
The 10-Day Post-Gap Method
The signature of the Earnings Reaction Gaps method is a swing approach working the ten sessions after a significant gap, the window where institutional repositioning plays out. Entries come from specific candlestick combinations rather than gut feel, and the risk framework treats the report date itself as a hard line: exposure before the print is a different decision from exposure after it. The implied-volatility module reads option pricing as a forecast of the market’s expected move, context most gap traders skip entirely.
A Research Study, Not Just Slides
The materials are unusually heavy for a workshop: a study PDF of more than 300 pages filled with data tables and graphic summaries, plus 80-plus annotated charts and recordings of every session. The data-first posture will feel familiar to students of quantitative day trading research, while the seasonal rhythm pairs naturally with weekly options income strategies that also key off earnings cycles.
Which Trader Gets the Payoff?
Active day and swing traders in growth names get the most: the method assumes you can watch positions during earnings season and act inside a ten-day window. Patient students who will actually read the research PDF, rather than skim the charts, compound the value further.
The honest limitation is the calendar: this edge concentrates around four earnings seasons a year, so it works best as a specialist play inside a broader approach, the way long-horizon stock investing carries the quiet months. Expecting daily signals from a seasonal method ends in forced trades.
About the Instructors
John Pocorobba and Jason Thompson run Ticker Monkey and bring veteran growth-stock pedigrees to the material, and their decision to publish a 300-page study rather than a highlight reel says something about the intended audience. For neutral grounding on the mechanics, Investopedia’s entry on price gaps is the place to calibrate.
Earnings Reaction Gaps: Common Questions Answered
What is the Earnings Reaction Gaps workshop?
It is Ticker Monkey’s 7-plus-hour program on trading post-earnings gaps in growth stocks, covering four ERx gap forms, a 10-day swing method, candlestick entries, implied volatility, and risk around report dates, with a 300-page research PDF.
Who teaches it?
John Pocorobba and Jason Thompson of Ticker Monkey, both long-tenured growth-stock traders.
Is the workshop worth it?
For active traders who work earnings seasons, the classification system plus the research data make a durable edge worth studying. Traders wanting a year-round signal machine will be disappointed by the seasonality.
Is it legit?
The workshop, the instructors, and the materials are all verifiable through Ticker Monkey’s own site, and attendees receive the full recordings.
Do I need options knowledge?
Only for the implied-volatility module; the core gap method trades common stock and requires standard charting literacy.
Final Grade on the Gap Workshop
Most earnings content recycles folklore; this workshop brings a taxonomy, a window, and 300 pages of evidence. Learn the four forms, respect the report date, and let the other eight months of the year belong to your base method. Everything described is instruction; the outcomes ride on your own decisions.
